American Diversity; Considering the Minorities
The political phenomena in the convention of
Democratic Party in 2008, showed the achievement of the recognition of both
woman and black in the U.S. politics. Barrack Obama and Hillary Clinton run for
their candidacy as U.S. president through Democratic Party. Women and
minorities group in the U.S. society are really significant to discuss the
power relation in America. Their struggle over the times gains more recognition
in the multicultural society where White Anglo-Saxon Protestant Male used to be
the dominance. Race and gender are challenging issues in American cultural studies
-multiculturalism, feminism, and reconciliation with indigenous people.
Diversity is unquestionably the characteristics of the
U.S. society. Mauk and Oakland explain the facts of diversity on how women and
minorities in the U.S. have experienced hard struggles for the recognition and
equality. The tearful slavery ended by Thirteenth Amendment in 1865, long
journey for the women movement is finally recognized by the Nineteenth
Amendment in 1920. Even though constitutionally recognized, there was no automatic
shifts in the attitude of the society, more struggle was still needed to gain
more ‘real’ equality in the society. Kean and Campbells emphasize that the U.S.
in the 60s seems to be very important to represent the flourished movement of
the marginalized group in the society. In addition, Asian American and Latinos
are other minorities defined by Mauk and Oakland as well as the long confusion
of the existence of the Native-American, even though historically they
experienced difficulties dealing with the treatment of the dominant society,
they have better position in the society today. They are already involved in
various sectors of life, even though the position of Natives is questioned even
until today. I criticize that Mauk and Oakland tends to discuss minorities
limited by racial identity. In terms of gender, despite women issue, minor
sexual orientation group should be addressed to discuss minorities in the U.S.
as they come above the water recently, the struggle for recognition and equal
rights in the society appears to be a debate against the social and religious
values, the accommodation under law is still waiting for adoption. Viewing
America, as Campbell and Kean has stated should on the basis of balance in the
continuous assimilation and pluralism by also
considering the “difference.”
Underlining Kean and Campbell, the question of assimilation can
be put at the first place to address the multi-ethnical America. They basically
reject the proposal of uniting America in one language and culture as the idea
will reject the identity of the ethnicity and the need to exercise the culture
of their own. Americannes is not necessary identified by a unity – it should be
in the line of multiculturalism. Further, dealing with the
Native-American, assimilation seems to be difficult, Turner as quoted by Kean
and Campbell mentions it as “savagery” against “civilization”, I, however,
rather view this as extreme different ways of life. The way White viewing life
is on the opposite direction of the Native’s. Thus, assimilation is not an
option, tribal identity is preserved through conservation. The question is also
applicable to discuss the American society in general, if assimilation is the
proposal, should the White culture be put on top to be the direction of the
assimilation? Melting pot that is seemingly appropriate to name the
assimilation process of cultural hybrids in the U.S. tends to be fail to view
the ideological conflicts bringing the consequences of marginalization and
sub-ordination. Kean and Campbell also try to draw us in the history of
African-American. A long racial discrimination still have to be experienced by
African-American even after the abolition of slavery -1865. Black voices in the
sounds of longing for equality is part of American cultural interaction
coloured by the rhythm of racism –the dominant White is again becoming the
basic criticism.
Immigration may not be left to discuss the diverse
America, the waves of immigrants has been continuously flooding to promising
land. It can not be denied that immigrants contribute to the
multiculturalism in the U.S. as well as social problems that sometimes
considered as a threat toward the supremacy of the White or in some cases
posited against the immigrants from the western hemisphere –European countries.
It can be viewed through out the history of the U.S. government policies to
solve the immigration problems such, literacy test, Chinese exclusion acts or
even the quota act that is criticized by Mae M. Ngai. Such restriction in the name
of nations of origin that seems to be non-discriminatory way is indeed showing
the a priori of the dominant White society in the future America.
Race as the basic consideration in conducting a certain regulation or law can
be viewed as racism. Criticizing the Quota System, Ngai underlines that
“National Origin,” “native stock,” “nationality,” and other categories were not
natural units of classification; they were constructed according to certain
social values and political judgement.
To summarize, the diverse ethnicity in the U.S. can be
trailed back through the history of the nations: colonization and
immigration both forced or voluntarily. It, therefore, contributes to the
multicultural U.S. The problems derived from the issue are the domination and
subordination based on the race or ethnic identity under the White supremacy
–minorities discrimination. Despite the issue of race, in terms of
discrimination and minorities, gender issue also colours the cultural
interactions in the U.S. society -women and minor sexual orientation. These
issues –discrimination and equality-- are significant as the approach to
deal with American Studies.
References:
Neil Campbell and Alasdair Kean, American
Cultural Studies An Introduction to American Culture (London:
Routledge, 2006), Chapter 2-3
David Mauk and John Oakland, American
Civilization (New York: Routledge, 2009), Chapter 4
Mae M. Ngai, The Johnson-Reed Act of 1924 and the
Reconstruction of Race in Immigration Law, in Janice Radway et
al., American Studies: an Anthology (Chichester:
Wiley-Blackwell, 2009)